l9n/ Connecticut

2002 Regular Session

House Bill 5501

AN ACT CONCERNING THE STUDY OF THE NEUROFEEDBACK PROGRAM.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives's Joint Committee on Legislative Management Committee on April 17, 2002. The 2002 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To use all of any surplus funds in the open choice program for supplemental grants for receiving districts in order to encourage them to open additional spaces for students in the program, to provide funds for the expansion of the Bristol Regional Environmental Center and to provide for the establishment of an Education and Neurofeedback pilot program that improves literacy in children with learning disabilities and attention deficit disorders and reduces the use of psychotropic drugs for such school children.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

1 co-sponsor

Lenny T. Winkler

Its course

February 22 to April 17, 2002, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action16 actions on 10 days

In the House of RepresentativesFeb 22 to Apr 17 · stopped54 days

Education CommitteeFeb 22 to Mar 1521 days

Public Health CommitteeMar 15 to Mar 205 days

Joint Committee on Legislative ManagementApr 10 to Apr 17 · stopped7 days

Text

Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Feb 22 – Apr 17

  1. Introduced and sent to Education Committee
  2. Heard in Education Committee
  3. Education Committee recommended a substitute for it and sent it to Public Health Committee
  4. Public Health Committee recommended a substitute for it
  5. Sent to Joint Committee on Legislative Management
  6. Joint Committee on Legislative Management took no action on it
All 16 actions, as published