l9n/ Connecticut

2002 Regular Session

Senate Bill 154

AN ACT CONCERNING THE COMPETITIVE TRANSITION ASSESSMENT FOR MANUFACTURING PLANTS IN DISTRESSED MUNICIPALITIES.

Became law as Public Act 02-141, signed June 14, 2002, 120 days after it was filed.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To authorize the siting council to use a streamlined regulatory petition mechanism to approve telecommunications towers that have been previously approved by municipal regulators.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

5 co-sponsors

Judith G. Freedman, Thomas A. Bozek, Biagio Ciotto, Gary D. LeBeau, Eileen M. Daily

In the House of Representatives

    3 co-sponsors

    Richard O Belden, Roger Brian Michele, Leonard C. Greene Jr.

    Its course

    February 14 to June 14, 2002, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action26 actions on 13 days

    In the SenateFeb 14 to May 782 days

    Energy and Technology CommitteeFeb 14 to Mar 519 days

    In the House of RepresentativesMay 7 to May 81 day

    Waiting to be sentMay 8 to May 3123 days

    With the GovernorMay 31 to Jun 1414 days

    Amendments

    Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

    • Senate floor amendmentAdopted

      Adopted May 7 · Adopted May 8

    • House of Representatives floor amendmentWithdrawn

      Withdrawn May 8

    Text

    Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

    In the Senate Feb 14 – May 7

    1. Introduced and sent to Energy and Technology Committee
    2. Heard in Energy and Technology Committee
    3. Energy and Technology Committee recommended a substitute for it and sent it to Planning and Development Committee
    4. Planning and Development Committee recommended a substitute for it
    5. The Senate adopted Senate Amendment A
    6. Passed the Senate with Senate Amendment A

    In the House of Representatives May 7 – May 8

    1. Sent to the House of Representatives
    2. The House of Representatives adopted Senate Amendment A
    3. House of Representatives Amendment A was withdrawn
    4. Passed the House of Representatives with Senate Amendment A

    To the Governor May 21 – Jun 14

    1. Numbered Public Act 02-141
    2. Sent to the Secretary of the State
    3. Signed by the Governor
    All 26 actions, as published