l9n/ Connecticut

2002 Regular Session

Senate Bill 550

AN ACT CONCERNING THE DEVELOPMENT OF A SYSTEM FOR CHECKING ERRORS IN THE DISPENSING OF MEDICATIONS.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives on May 2, 2002. The 2002 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To provide that consumers shall be reimbursed for additional costs incurred in connection with their prescriptions as a result of errors made by a mail order pharmacy and to establish a system for checking errors made when prescriptions are dispensed to patients.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

8 co-sponsors

Mary Ann Handley, Edith G. Prague, George L. Gunther H.L.D., Catherine W. Cook, Win Smith, Thomas P. Gaffey, Bill Finch, Thomas A. Bozek

In the House of Representatives

    2 co-sponsors

    Christopher L. Caruso, Dennis H. Cleary

    Its course

    March 5 to May 2, 2002, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action22 actions on 13 days

    In the SenateMar 5 to May 157 days

    Public Health CommitteeMar 5 to Mar 1914 days

    Judiciary CommitteeApr 10 to Apr 155 days

    In the House of RepresentativesMay 1 to May 2 · stopped1 day

    Amendments

    Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

    • Senate floor amendmentAdopted

      Adopted May 1

    Text

    Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

    In the Senate Mar 5 – May 1

    1. Mar 5Introduced and sent to Public Health Committee
    2. Mar 8Heard in Public Health Committee
    3. Mar 19Public Health Committee recommended a substitute for it
    4. Apr 10Sent to Judiciary Committee
    5. Apr 15Judiciary Committee recommended a substitute for it
    6. May 1The Senate adopted Senate Amendment A
    7. Passed the Senate with Senate Amendment A

    In the House of Representatives May 1

    1. May 1Sent to the House of Representatives
    All 22 actions, as published
    1. Mar 5REF. TO JOINT COMM. ONBoth houses
    2. Mar 8PUBLIC HEARINGBoth houses
    3. Mar 19Joint Favorable SubstituteBoth houses
    4. Mar 20FILED WITH LCOBoth houses
    5. Mar 26REFERRED TO OLR, OFABoth houses
    6. Apr 3RPTD. OUT OF LCOBoth houses
    7. Apr 3FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.Senate
    8. Apr 3SENATE CALENDAR NUMBERSenate
    9. Apr 3FILE NO.Both houses
    10. Apr 10REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ONSenate
    11. Apr 15Joint Favorable SubstituteBoth houses
    12. Apr 16FILED WITH LCOBoth houses
    13. Apr 18REFERRED TO OLR, OFABoth houses
    14. Apr 24RPTD. OUT OF LCOBoth houses
    15. Apr 24NEW FILE BY COMM. ONBoth houses
    16. Apr 24FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.Senate
    17. Apr 24FILE NO.Both houses
    18. May 1SEN. ADOPTED SEN. AMEND. SCH.Senate
    19. May 1SEN. PASSED, SEN. AMEND. SCH.Senate
    20. May 1RULES SUSPENDED,TRANS.TO HOUSESenate
    21. May 2FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDARHouse of Representatives
    22. May 2HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBERHouse of Representatives