l9n/ Connecticut

2003 Regular Session

House Bill 5337

AN ACT CONCERNING PERFORMANCE-INFORMED BUDGETING OF STATE AGENCIES.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives on May 13, 2003. The 2003 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To (1) reestablish the Connecticut Progress Council, (2) require the council to develop new benchmarks for use in developing the state budget, (3) require each state agency to identify which benchmarks it has cognizance over, (4) require the Secretary of the Office of Policy and Management to determine which agency shall be the lead coordinating agency for any benchmark that is shared by more than one agency, and (5) use such benchmarks in the budgeting process and require that the Governor's budget document be based on such benchmarks.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

4 co-sponsors

Diana S. Urban, Jefferson B. Davis, James Field Spallone, Steven T. Mikutel

In the Senate

    1 co-sponsor

    Gary D. LeBeau

    Its course

    January 21 to May 13, 2003, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action25 actions on 15 days

    In the House of RepresentativesJan 21 to May 13 · stopped112 days

    Appropriations CommitteeMay 6 to May 126 days

    Text

    Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

    In the House of Representatives Jan 21 – May 12

    1. Introduced and sent to Government Administration and Elections Committee
    2. Heard in Government Administration and Elections Committee
    3. Drafted as a bill by Government Administration and Elections Committee
    4. Sent to Government Administration and Elections Committee
    5. Government Administration and Elections Committee recommended it
    6. Sent to Joint Committee on Legislative Management
    7. Joint Committee on Legislative Management recommended it
    8. Sent to Appropriations Committee
    9. Appropriations Committee recommended it
    All 25 actions, as published