l9n/ Connecticut

2003 Regular Session

Senate Bill 687

AN ACT CONCERNING LEGISLATIVE OVERSIGHT OF THE FEDERAL WAIVER APPLICATION PROCESS.

Vetoed by the Governor on June 26, 2003; the veto was not overridden. The 2003 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To ensure that waiver applications submitted to the federal government by the Commissioner of Social Services pursuant to section 17b-8 of the general statutes, incorporate modifications approved by the joint standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to appropriations and the budgets of state agencies and the joint standing committee of the General Assembly having cognizance of matters relating to human services.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

2 co-sponsors

Mary Ann Handley, Kevin B. Sullivan

Its course

January 24 to June 26, 2003, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action34 actions on 20 days

In the SenateJan 24 to May 20116 days

Human Services CommitteeJan 24 to Feb 2734 days

Appropriations CommitteeMar 26 to May 136 days

In the House of RepresentativesMay 20 to Jun 213 days

Waiting to be sentJun 2 to Jun 119 days

With the GovernorJun 11 to Jun 2615 days

After the vetoJun 26 to Jun 26 · stopped0 days

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • Senate floor amendmentAdopted

    Adopted May 20 · Adopted Jun 2

  • Senate floor amendmentRejected

    Rejected May 20

Text

Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 24 – May 20

  1. Introduced and sent to Human Services Committee
  2. Drafted as a bill by Human Services Committee
  3. Sent to Human Services Committee
  4. Heard in Human Services Committee
  5. Human Services Committee recommended a substitute for it
  6. Sent to Appropriations Committee
  7. Appropriations Committee recommended it
  8. Sent to Joint Committee on Legislative Management
  9. Joint Committee on Legislative Management recommended it
  10. The Senate adopted Senate Amendment A
  11. The Senate rejected Senate Amendment B
  12. Passed the Senate with Senate Amendment A

In the House of Representatives May 21 – Jun 2

  1. Arrived in the House of Representatives
  2. The House of Representatives adopted Senate Amendment A
  3. Passed the House of Representatives with Senate Amendment A

To the Governor Jun 10 – Jun 26

  1. Numbered Public Act 03-165
  2. Sent to the Secretary of the State
  3. Vetoed by the Governor
All 34 actions, as published