l9n/ Connecticut

2004 Regular Session

House Bill 5044

AN ACT CONCERNING PLANS OF CONSERVATION AND DEVELOPMENT.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives on May 5, 2004. The 2004 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To promote consistency in state and regional plans of conservation and development and to provide for priority funding areas and for corridor management areas along limited access highways and rail lines.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

7 co-sponsors

Marilyn Giuliano, Richard Roy, Peter A. Tercyak, Sonya Googins, Felipe Reinoso, Bob Godfrey, Lewis J. Wallace Jr.

In the Senate

    1 co-sponsor

    Edith G. Prague

    Its course

    February 5 to May 5, 2004, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action34 actions on 18 days

    In the House of RepresentativesFeb 5 to May 5 · stopped90 days

    Appropriations CommitteeMar 30 to Apr 78 days

    Transportation CommitteeApr 13 to Apr 152 days

    Environment CommitteeApr 20 to Apr 211 day

    Amendments

    Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

    • House of Representatives floor amendmentAdopted

      Adopted Apr 27

    • House of Representatives floor amendmentRejected

      Rejected Apr 27

    • House of Representatives floor amendmentRejected

      Rejected Apr 27

    • House of Representatives floor amendmentPending

    Text

    Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

    In the House of Representatives Feb 5 – Apr 27

    1. Introduced and sent to Planning and Development Committee
    2. Heard in Planning and Development Committee
    3. Planning and Development Committee recommended a substitute for it
    4. Sent to Appropriations Committee
    5. Appropriations Committee recommended it
    6. Sent to Transportation Committee
    7. Transportation Committee recommended it
    8. Sent to Environment Committee
    9. Environment Committee recommended it
    10. The House of Representatives adopted House of Representatives Amendment A
    11. The House of Representatives rejected House of Representatives Amendment B
    12. The House of Representatives rejected House of Representatives Amendment C
    13. Failed in the House of Representatives
    All 34 actions, as published