l9n/ Connecticut

2004 Regular Session

House Bill 5587

AN ACT CONCERNING ASH RESIDUE DISPOSAL AREAS.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives on April 26, 2004. The 2004 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To establish a task force to study the potential for reuse of ash residue from waste-to-energy plants and the capacity of available solid waste disposal facilities to accept ash residue; to allow the Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority to establish an ash residue disposal area on sites that meet siting criteria established by the Commissioner of Environmental Protection as appropriate for such facilities rather than on sites identified in the report prepared pursuant to section 22a-228b entitled "Identification of Potential Ash Residue Disposal Sites" and dated January, 1989; to clarify that the Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority shall be the owner of any ash residue disposal area in the state; to require the Commissioner of Environmental Protection to amend the state's solid waste management plan as the commissioner deems appropriate; and to allow the Commissioner of Environmental Protection to consult with the Connecticut Resources Recovery Authority in amending such plan.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

Its course

February 27 to April 26, 2004, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action17 actions on 11 days

In the House of RepresentativesFeb 27 to Apr 26 · stopped59 days

Environment CommitteeFeb 27 to Mar 1517 days

Text

Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Feb 27 – Apr 13

  1. Introduced and sent to Environment Committee
  2. Heard in Environment Committee
  3. Environment Committee recommended a substitute for it
  4. Sent to Joint Committee on Legislative Management
  5. Joint Committee on Legislative Management recommended a substitute for it
All 17 actions, as published