l9n/ Connecticut

2005 Regular Session

Senate Bill 968

AN ACT CONCERNING CRIMINAL BACKGROUND CHECKS FOR NURSING HOME EMPLOYEES WHO PROVIDE DIRECT CARE TO RESIDENTS.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate on May 19, 2005. The 2005 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To require certain mandatory reporting concerning the state criminal backgrounds of persons who provide direct patient care in nursing homes, including temporary employees and volunteers, and to establish criteria that a nursing home shall consider when determining whether to hire or retain an employee or volunteer with a state criminal history record.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

3 co-sponsors

Edith G. Prague, John A. Kissel, Gayle S. Slossberg

Its course

January 31 to May 19, 2005, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action40 actions on 22 days

In the SenateJan 31 to May 19 · stopped108 days

Aging CommitteeJan 31 to Mar 836 days

Public Health CommitteeMar 8 to Mar 1810 days

Human Services CommitteeApr 26 to Apr 271 day

Appropriations CommitteeMay 11 to May 165 days

Text

Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 31 – May 16

  1. Introduced and sent to Aging Committee
  2. Heard in Aging Committee
  3. Aging Committee recommended a substitute for it and sent it to Public Health Committee
  4. Public Health Committee recommended a substitute for it
  5. Sent to Public Safety and Security Committee
  6. Public Safety and Security Committee recommended it
  7. Sent to Human Services Committee
  8. Human Services Committee recommended it
  9. Sent to Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee
  10. Sent to Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee
  11. Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee recommended it
  12. Sent to Appropriations Committee
  13. Appropriations Committee recommended it
All 40 actions, as published