Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee on April 28, 2006. The 2006 session has ended.
2006 Regular Session
Senate Bill 665
AN ACT RESTRICTING THE USE OF EMINENT DOMAIN AND AUTHORIZING MUNICIPALITIES TO ESTABLISH SEPARATE RATES OF TAXATION FOR REAL ESTATE.
What it does
The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.
To (1) allow certain property owners to repurchase property taken from them by eminent domain if the land is not used for a public use and is subsequently resold, (2) prohibit persons from misrepresenting that they are authorized to acquire property by eminent domain by making such misrepresentation an unfair trade practice, (3) require appraisals in eminent domain proceedings to be conducted by state-licensed real estate appraisers in accordance with uniform standards, (4) require the consent of the parties before a court may appoint a judge trial referee to review a statement of compensation in an eminent domain proceeding, (5) increase the maximum payments for relocation assistance, and (6) revise the standards used by local legislative bodies prior to authorizing the use of eminent domain pursuant to a development plan under chapter 132 of the general statutes.
Sponsors
Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.
In the Senate
Sponsor
Its course
March 10 to April 28, 2006, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.
Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.
Every action20 actions on 11 days
In the SenateMar 10 to Apr 28 · stopped49 days
Judiciary CommitteeMar 10 to Mar 2414 days
Planning and Development CommitteeApr 13 to Apr 196 days
Finance, Revenue and Bonding CommitteeApr 28 to Apr 28 · stopped0 days
Text
Each version as the General Assembly printed it.
l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.
What happened
In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.
In the Senate Mar 10 – Apr 28
- Mar 10Introduced and sent to Judiciary Committee
- Mar 13Heard in Judiciary Committee
- Mar 24Judiciary Committee recommended it
- Apr 13Sent to Planning and Development Committee
- Apr 19Planning and Development Committee recommended a substitute for it
- Apr 28Sent to Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee
All 20 actions, as published
- Mar 10REF. TO JOINT COMM. ONBoth houses
- Mar 13PUBLIC HEARINGBoth houses
- Mar 24Joint FavorableBoth houses
- Mar 27FILED WITH LCOBoth houses
- Apr 3REFERRED TO OLR, OFABoth houses
- Apr 10RPTD. OUT OF LCOBoth houses
- Apr 10FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.Senate
- Apr 10SENATE CALENDAR NUMBERSenate
- Apr 10FILE NO.Both houses
- Apr 13REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ONSenate
- Apr 13IMMEDIATE TRANSMITTAL TO COMMITTEESenate
- Apr 19Joint Favorable SubstituteBoth houses
- Apr 19FILED WITH LCOBoth houses
- Apr 20REFERRED TO OLR, OFABoth houses
- Apr 25RPTD. OUT OF LCOBoth houses
- Apr 25NEW FILE BY COMM. ONBoth houses
- Apr 25FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.Senate
- Apr 25FILE NO.Both houses
- Apr 28REF. BY SEN. TO COMM. ONSenate
- Apr 28RULES SUSPENDED/IMMEDIATE TRANSMITTALSenate