l9n/ Connecticut

2010 Regular Session

House Bill 5348

AN ACT IMPLEMENTING ADDITIONAL RECOMMENDATIONS OF THE PROGRAM REVIEW AND INVESTIGATIONS COMMITTEE CONCERNING RETALIATION FOR WHISTLEBLOWER COMPLAINTS.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives on April 27, 2010. The 2010 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To implement the recommendations of the Legislative Program Review and Investigations Committee concerning whistleblowers: To require the Attorney General and the Auditors of Public Accounts to post a summary of all complaints on their web site every six months, to require a more detailed report be submitted to the General Assembly, to extend the filing requirement for complaints to ninety days, to extend the rebuttable presumption period for retaliation complaints to two years, to allow human rights referees to grant temporary relief and to permit amendments to complaints, and to repeal the provision setting forth a process for requesting the Attorney General to investigate retaliation complaints.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

1 co-sponsor

Mary M. Mushinsky

Its course

February 24 to April 27, 2010, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action20 actions on 12 days

In the House of RepresentativesFeb 24 to Apr 27 · stopped62 days

Judiciary CommitteeApr 20 to Apr 277 days

Text

Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

In the House of Representatives Feb 24 – Apr 27

  1. Introduced and sent to Program Review and Investigations Committee
  2. Heard in Program Review and Investigations Committee
  3. Program Review and Investigations Committee recommended a substitute for it and sent it to Government Administration and Elections Committee
  4. Government Administration and Elections Committee recommended it
  5. Sent to Judiciary Committee
  6. Judiciary Committee recommended it
All 20 actions, as published