l9n/ Connecticut

2012 Regular Session

House Joint Resolution 2

RESOLUTION PROPOSING AN AMENDMENT TO THE STATE CONSTITUTION TO GRANT INCREASED AUTHORITY TO THE GENERAL ASSEMBLY REGARDING ELECTION ADMINISTRATION.

Sent to the Secretary of the State, on May 4, 2012.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

23 co-sponsors

Patricia M. Widlitz, Bob Godfrey, Philip J. Miller, Matthew L. Lesser, Robert W. Megna, Susan M. Johnson, David A. Baram, Matthew Ritter, James M. Albis, Ezequiel Santiago, Elissa T. Wright, Peggy Sayers, Jonathan Steinberg, Kim Rose, Elizabeth B. Ritter, Henry J. Genga, Hector L. Robles, Minnie Gonzalez, Geoff Luxenberg, Bruce V. Morris, Kim Fawcett, Russell A. Morin, Diana S. Urban

In the Senate

2 co-sponsors

Bob Duff, John W. Fonfara

Amendments

Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

  • House of Representatives floor amendmentRejected

    Rejected Apr 4

  • Senate floor amendmentRejected

    Rejected Apr 18

  • Senate floor amendmentRejected

    Rejected Apr 18

  • Senate floor amendmentRejected

    Rejected Apr 18

Text

Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

In both houses Feb 9 – Mar 12

  1. Feb 9Introduced and sent to Government Administration and Elections Committee
  2. Feb 27Heard in Government Administration and Elections Committee
  3. Mar 12Government Administration and Elections Committee recommended a substitute for it

In the House of Representatives Apr 4

  1. Apr 4The House of Representatives rejected House of Representatives Amendment A
  2. Failed in the House of Representatives, short of the three-quarters it needed

In the Senate Apr 9 – Apr 18

  1. Apr 9Arrived in the Senate
  2. Apr 18The Senate rejected Senate Amendment A
  3. The Senate rejected Senate Amendment B
  4. The Senate rejected Senate Amendment C
  5. Adopted in the Senate
  6. Failed in the Senate, short of the three-quarters it needed

In both houses May 4

  1. May 4Sent to the Secretary of the State
All 20 actions, as published
  1. Feb 9REF. TO JOINT COMM. ONBoth houses
  2. Feb 27PUBLIC HEARINGBoth houses
  3. Mar 12Joint Favorable SubstituteBoth houses
  4. Mar 13FILED WITH LCOBoth houses
  5. Mar 16REFERRED TO OLR, OFABoth houses
  6. Mar 22RPTD. OUT OF LCOBoth houses
  7. Mar 22FAV. RPT., TABLED FOR HOUSE CALENDARHouse of Representatives
  8. Mar 22HOUSE CALENDAR NUMBERHouse of Representatives
  9. Mar 22FILE NO.Both houses
  10. Apr 4HOUSE REJECTED HOUSE AMEND. SCH.House of Representatives
  11. Apr 4HOUSE ADOPTED, BUT NOT BY THE NECESSARY 3/4THSHouse of Representatives
  12. Apr 9FAV. RPT., TAB. FOR CAL., SEN.Senate
  13. Apr 9SENATE CALENDAR NUMBERSenate
  14. Apr 18SEN. REJ. SEN. AMEND. SCH.Senate
  15. Apr 18SEN. REJ. SEN. AMEND. SCH.Senate
  16. Apr 18SEN. REJ. SEN. AMEND. SCH.Senate
  17. Apr 18ADOPTED, SENATESenate
  18. Apr 18IN CONCURRENCESenate
  19. Apr 18SEN. FAILED TO PASS BY 3/4 OF BODYSenate
  20. May 4TRANSMITTED TO SECRETARY OF THE STATEBoth houses