l9n/ Connecticut

2013 Regular Session

Senate Bill 459

AN ACT CONCERNING LOCAL CONTROL OVER COASTAL AREAS.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Planning and Development Committee on June 4, 2013. The 2013 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To authorize municipalities to exempt certain decks, structural components, other than foundations, used to support residences and seawalls from coastal site plan review; to exempt such decks, structural components and seawalls from permitting through the Department of Energy and Environmental Protection; and to require sand, gravel and other materials removed waterward of the mean high water mark of the tidal, coastal or navigable waters to be offered to municipalities and certain special taxing districts for beach restoration before being disposed of.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

1 co-sponsor

Leonard A. Fasano

Its course

January 23 to June 4, 2013, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

Every action20 actions on 14 days

In the SenateJan 23 to Jun 4 · stopped132 days

Planning and Development CommitteeJan 23 to Mar 2258 days

Environment CommitteeApr 18 to Apr 235 days

Planning and Development CommitteeJun 4 to Jun 4 · stopped0 days

Text

Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

What happened

In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

In the Senate Jan 23 – Jun 4

  1. Introduced and sent to Planning and Development Committee
  2. Drafted as a bill by Planning and Development Committee
  3. Sent to Planning and Development Committee
  4. Heard in Planning and Development Committee
  5. Planning and Development Committee recommended a substitute for it
  6. Sent to Environment Committee
  7. Environment Committee recommended a substitute for it
  8. Sent to Planning and Development Committee
All 20 actions, as published