l9n/ Connecticut

2013 Regular Session

Senate Bill 928

AN ACT CONCERNING PRECIOUS METALS OR STONES DEALERS.

Became law as Public Act 13-255, signed July 11, 2013, 141 days after it was filed.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To require precious metals or stones dealers to provide a periodic statement of transactions in an electronic format to the local licensing authority and retain any goods purchased for at least ten days, and to make the requirements applicable to precious metals or stones dealers similar to those applicable to secondhand dealers.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

1 co-sponsor

Anthony J. Musto

In the House of Representatives

    2 co-sponsors

    Patricia M. Widlitz, Joseph C. Serra

    Its course

    February 20 to July 11, 2013, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action45 actions on 20 days

    In the SenateFeb 20 to May 1483 days

    General Law CommitteeApr 18 to Apr 235 days

    In the House of RepresentativesMay 14 to Jun 320 days

    Back in the SenateJun 3 to Jun 1916 days

    Waiting to be sentJun 19 to Jun 267 days

    With the GovernorJun 26 to Jul 1115 days

    Amendments

    Each amendment offered, and what became of it.

    • Senate floor amendmentAdopted

      Adopted May 14 · Adopted Jun 3

    • Senate floor amendmentAdopted

      Adopted Jun 5

    • House of Representatives floor amendmentAdopted

      Adopted Jun 3 · Senate agreed Jun 5

    Text

    Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

    In the Senate Feb 20 – May 14

    1. Introduced and sent to Public Safety and Security Committee
    2. Heard in Public Safety and Security Committee
    3. Public Safety and Security Committee recommended a substitute for it
    4. Sent to General Law Committee
    5. General Law Committee recommended it
    6. The Senate adopted Senate Amendment A
    7. Passed the Senate with Senate Amendment A

    In the House of Representatives May 15 – Jun 3

    1. Arrived in the House of Representatives
    2. Sent to Government Administration and Elections Committee
    3. Government Administration and Elections Committee recommended it
    4. The House of Representatives adopted Senate Amendment A
    5. The House of Representatives adopted House of Representatives Amendment A
    6. Passed the House of Representatives with Senate Amendment A

    Back in the Senate Jun 3 – Jun 19

    1. Passed the House of Representatives with House of Representatives Amendment A
    2. Sent to the Senate
    3. The Senate agreed to House of Representatives Amendment A
    4. The Senate adopted Senate Amendment B
    5. Passed the Senate with House of Representatives Amendment A
    6. Passed the Senate with Senate Amendments A and B
    7. Sent to the House of Representatives
    8. The House of Representatives adopted Senate Amendment B
    9. Passed the House of Representatives with House of Representatives Amendment A
    10. Passed the House of Representatives with Senate Amendments A and B
    11. Numbered Public Act 13-255

    To the Governor Jun 26 – Jul 11

    1. Sent to the Secretary of the State
    2. Sent to the Governor
    3. Signed by the Governor
    All 45 actions, as published