l9n/ Connecticut

2014 Regular Session

Senate Bill 264

AN ACT ESTABLISHING A TASK FORCE ON THE HUMANE TREATMENT OF ANIMALS IN MUNICIPAL SHELTERS.

Did not become law. It stopped in the Senate's Environment Committee on April 10, 2014. The 2014 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To establish a task force to consider (1) the establishment of standards for the humane treatment of animals; (2) education for animal control officers on current license laws; (3) rules and regulations regarding and penalties for abuse; (4) the development of a system to track persons who have been convicted of animal abuse in order to prevent such persons from acquiring animals from shelters in other municipalities or states; (5) the establishment of standards for rescue organizations to use when evaluating foster homes; (6) the establishment of rules and responsibilities for volunteer groups that work with municipal shelters and animal control officers; and (7) the creation of a framework to coordinate the efforts of local humane organizations with volunteer groups, foster groups and municipal animal shelters.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the Senate

In the House of Representatives

    1 co-sponsor

    Auden Grogins

    Its course

    February 25 to April 10, 2014, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action11 actions on 8 days

    In the SenateFeb 25 to Apr 10 · stopped44 days

    Planning and Development CommitteeFeb 25 to Mar 1215 days

    Environment CommitteeApr 8 to Apr 10 · stopped2 days

    Text

    Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

    In the Senate Feb 25 – Apr 10

    1. Introduced and sent to Planning and Development Committee
    2. Heard in Planning and Development Committee
    3. Planning and Development Committee recommended it
    4. Sent to Environment Committee
    5. A motion to recommend it failed
    All 11 actions, as published