l9n/ Connecticut

2009 Regular Session

House Bill 5267

AN ACT CONCERNING THE USE OF SMALL TOWN ECONOMIC ASSISTANCE PROGRAM FUNDS TO CONVERT PRIME FARMLAND TO NONAGRICULTURAL USE.

Did not become law. It stopped in the House of Representatives on May 14, 2009. The 2009 session has ended.

What it does

The synopsis the General Assembly published with the bill.

To protect farmland by requiring municipalities who intend to use state funds for economic development under the small town economic assistance program to convert prime farmland to nonagricultural use to preserve an equivalent parcel of farmland or take other measures to preserve farmland in such municipality.

Sponsors

Who carried the bill in each chamber, and who signed on. Each name leads to the member's page.

In the House of Representatives

6 co-sponsors

Clark J. Chapin, Richard Roy, Mary G. Fritz, Jeffrey J. Berger, Patricia M. Widlitz, Auden Grogins

In the Senate

    2 co-sponsors

    Edward Meyer, Andrew M. Maynard

    Its course

    January 21 to May 14, 2009, on one scale. In the top row each mark is a day something happened; taller marks are busier days.

    Each committee stop sits inside its chamber.

    Every action29 actions on 17 days

    In the House of RepresentativesJan 21 to May 14 · stopped113 days

    Commerce CommitteeJan 21 to Feb 5 · moved on15 days

    Environment CommitteeFeb 5 to Mar 2043 days

    Text

    Each version as the General Assembly printed it.

    l9n doesn't hold this bill's text yet.

    What happened

    In l9n's words, one line for each step. Every action as the General Assembly published it is below.

    In the House of Representatives Jan 21 – May 4

    1. Introduced and sent to Commerce Committee
    2. Sent to Environment Committee
    3. Sent to Environment Committee
    4. Heard in Environment Committee
    5. Drafted as a bill by Environment Committee
    6. Sent to Environment Committee
    7. Environment Committee recommended a substitute for it
    8. Sent to Planning and Development Committee
    9. Planning and Development Committee recommended it
    10. Sent to Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee
    11. Finance, Revenue and Bonding Committee recommended a substitute for it
    All 29 actions, as published